Today

just now

Kate Middleton and prince William Za was fixed by prince Harry and Meagen Markl glory of the most gentle and emotional couple in the British royal family: the duke and the duchess Sussex often hold ha...

just now

in department analyze At present results and develop tasks for teachers is dependent on type of school, the settlement, and except this experience and age of the teacher. So, according to the last lo...

just now

The deputy of the State Duma Natalya Poklonskaya has told, than her husband Ivan Solovyov after departure from the job of the head of the working office of the ombudsman of human rights Tatyana Moskalkova will be engaged. of fapnews Lidiya Martynova Today, 03:43 0

just now

Prince Harry the Younger generation of members of the British royal family enjoys wide popularity in Great Britain and beyond her limits. However for quite some time now he had had an unexpected leade...

just now

Started the final stage of the stock "Great Names of Russia". Inherent names of the airports will also remain. Results of a sociological research will be presented on November 12 by Public chamber of...

Date: 2 months ago   Category: Politics

What place in colonial administration is taken by Kudrin and Chubais?


What place in colonial administration is taken by Kudrin and Chubais?
As this series was pleasant to the people, we will continue! And as a prolog and a subject for this text I will take a remark to one of texts previous. And though this question already understood "A ladder into the sky", probably, readers have no his final understanding Here yet, of course, questions much, but in reality they come down to one and only: and what, actually, business to the member of power group to the country and the people? For the correct answer to it a question it is necessary to consider several important circumstances. But we will begin with the simplest though far analogy, namely, a notorious "invisible hand of the market". There situation similar: a large number of spiders in bank who set up each other takes place, plunder, offend, and the economy nevertheless quite to itself grows. So why the country in which power groups fight for the power can't prosper? It is only analogy. And here the reasons why (sometimes, but not always) the countries and the people after all exist, at least two. The first consists that power groups exist within some corporate, state or design (in sense, for example, of global projects) borders. They, of course, can just try to sell the resources to "uncle", but in this case they who then? These are average citizens can fondly believe what can be stolen money and with them to go in other country happily to live. I, for example, in the 90th a little have even envied year the acquaintance who as a result of a certain Komsomol and foreign trade operation hapnut 2-3 million ัƒะต, have gone to Cyprus, have bought a country house, and have put the rest in bank and began to live for percent. And any, even the youngest authority precisely knows that is there where he has left, there are power groups which aren't loved when there are people at whom more money, than at their members is strong. That is, if you, for example, go to some Italian small village and you will have more than 100-200 000 euros, then you will be given quickly enough on hands. That didn't show off. And if you go to Hong Kong, then the critical sum rises already at least much, but also here, in case of her excess, you all the same should face sooner or later a question: and you, actually, whose you will be and on what right you own all this here? And if the worthy answer doesn't follow (that is if you don't show power group which is ready to bear for you the answer), then quickly enough your state will fall to the sizes, below critical. Anything personal, only Power. We will note, by the way, that many Russian rich merchants between two Russian revolutions of 1917 have gone To the west with the capitals! Any of them couldn't keep them more than 10-15 years. None of them could build own empires there. For very simple reason โ€” they were strangers. Or, say, Rachmaninov not to give Sikorsky's examples. First, because they were geniuses (to whom the law isn't written), secondly, they haven't created industrial empires. Personally rich they became, is system the rich โ€” no. But, mozha

URL:

Photos of day

Category: Media

Category: Media

Category: Media

Category: Media

Category: Media

Category: Media