Today

2 months ago

Donald and Melanija Trump The other day Melanija Trump and her husband Donald visited a lunch in honor of Thanksgiving Day in Maher - Lago. The first lady of the USA looked incredibly in a black lacy...

2 months ago

In Krasnoyarsk will open a skating rink with color ice. Its total area will be about 17.5 thousand sq.m. It will be possible to go ice skating in the pleasure daily from 11 to 23 o'clock. Besides, it...

2 months ago

The Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov holds a meeting with the Portuguese colleague to Augusht Santushem Silvoy in Lisbon. The meeting takes place in the closed format. The correspondent of TASS...

2 months ago

Relatives of 55 residents of the Netherlands which died as a result of the crash of the liner of "Malaysian airlines" in the east of the Ukrainian state within last year submitted to the European Cou...

2 months ago

Two VS ships of Russia are found on November 24 in sea border of Latvia. Such statement was made by the National Armed Forces (NAF) of the country on the Twitter. LV ekskl. ekonom. zona 11 j.j. no ter...

Date: 4 months ago   Category: Politics

Degenerates murderers: why party double-dealing fellows calls for repentance


Degenerates murderers: why party double-dealing fellows calls for repentance
Andrey FEFELOV. In the 1990s those who at us are called "liberals" have launched the campaign calling the people, first of all Russians to collective repentance for the Stalin past. Having lasted fifteen years, this bacchanalia, without having achieved result, I have a little ceased. And today — new splash. Only one example: On August 20 Alexander Tsipko's note "Hatred to the truth has been published in Moskovskij Komsomolets: who urges to admire crimes of the governors, than the Russian patriotism differs from Soviet". The main thesis is as follows: the one who opposes collective repentance for the Stalin past, in fact, acquits him and doesn't regret for the victims. Practically all examples which are given by Tsipko are taken from your article published in the Zavtra newspaper. I think, on the example of Tsipko's article it makes sense to talk about a certain tendency, about the reasons of her revival, about the types representing her. Andrey FURSOV. I saw this article. And about her author in itself to speak about her, really, there is no sense: the intellectual and moral poverty is available. It is more interesting to talk about a tendency. When read article, I had had a feeling that I have returned to the most mean late Perestroika time, to rough and violent dawn of a gorbachyovshchina when Perestroika worthless things, all these "double-dealing fellows" with the party membership card in a pocket have ceased to be afraid. At first they acted with caution and caution: and suddenly it is only a campaign? And then, having got rid of fear, were developed at full capacity. Tsipko's article in "MK" is, first of all, an eructation of times of a late gorbachyovshchina. Andrey FEFELOV. There is an expression: "Times were worse, but wasn't more meanly". Andrey FURSOV. And as well as in late Perestroika times — company handwriting of that time: defamation, overexposures, perevirany. Even in small article they are enough. There are several examples. Having quoted my thought that in the 1990th any years bastards have started talking about need of repentance for Stalinism communism and that the sovetofobiya has quickly turned into russophobia, Tsipko, impudently distorting, writes that, across Fursov, "the main danger to the Russian soul … is an understanding of value of human life". And then attributes me an appeal to struggle with those who regret for the victims of Stalin "big terror". Also Tsipko attributes me a thesis about inadmissibility of a conversation on crimes of the Soviet era, that I am not sorry for the destroyed temples, the victims of GULAG, that according to Fursov, a conversation on crimes of Stalin communism — treachery in relation to Russia, that I forbid criticism of pre-revolutionary Russia, I forbid to call Stalin terror crime, the Russian power — totalitarianism, etc. Lies on lies! First of all, not all "victims" of repressions of 1936-1938 were innocent: to a wall have put many executioners of the Russian people and other indigenous people of Russia. What, Zinovyev, Postyshev, Eykhe or Bukharin — the innocent victims? That Bukharin who said that the Soviet power will bring up "new the person

URL:

Photos of day